As I begin Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison, I am astonished by the detail that the Narrator uses to explain his situation. He begins the book explaining to us not only that he is an invisible man but characterizes what that means for him. I feel that the narrator's description provokes a lot of imagery for the reader.
“In my hole in the basement there are exactly 1,369 lights. I’ve wired the entire ceiling, every inch of it.” and “My hole is warm and full of light. Yes, full of light. I doubt if there is a brighter spot in all New York than this hole of mine, and I do not exclude Broadway. Or the Empire State Building on a photographer’s dream night”.
The Narrator relates his home to these bright, exciting, and even dreamlike settings. Meanwhile the irony being that in such brightness he is really the opposite of invisible. For me these images help contribute to the fact that the narrator himself is so clearly not invisible, not literally nor in the way he expresses himself. By extension this presents the idea that the speaker himself is not actually invisible but it truly is the eyes or others that make him so.
Based off of my experience reading the prologue of Invisible Man, I feel I can connect to the narrator in my personal experiences in various ways. Most relatable I would say is in my age. Many adolescents I think can relate to the fact that we feel kind of invisible. Because we are still children, we are automatically inexperienced, immature and innocent. On the other hand we are also nearing adulthood, which means that we are simultaneously expected to take on responsibility, and independence. The childish part of us is easy for adults to ignore, we are just children that are to be played with or entertained. But because we are also transitioning to adulthood we as teenagers feel that we should be treated as adults. This is a very simplified reason for why so often teenagers rebel, they desperately yearn to be seen and acknowledged as an individual. Therefore when I think about my identity as a teen, until I start conversation with an adult I feel they have a hard time seeing me as more than a kid.
In terms of invisibility, I can also relate to the author in the context of my gender. As a woman I feel often feel like I am supposed to be invisible. In discussion I often feel I have to go a long way to be heard. Even in conversation I feel like I am often interrupted or ignored when I speak my mind. When I do speak up and shout loud enough for the “sleep walkers” to hear me they awake very angrily from their daze as the narrator describes. They are disgusted by my matter of fact tone and make me feel bad for speaking my mind. These effects have made me feel as if no matter what I do, I’ll be seen as a woman therefore meaning that I must be docile, quiet, small and most importantly invisible to stay in my place.
The final example of invisibility I can relate to the narrator with, and possibly the most prominent in my life is my identity as a black person. I think Ellison definitely focuses on this aspect of invisibility in the prologue. Though the narrator never right out says that race is the reason he is seen as invisible, it is alluded to.
“What did I do to be so black and blue”
The narrator seems to suggest he is nothing more than a bunch of predetermined actions based on his race, a stereotype and that makes him feel blue. As a black person I often feel that I am expected to fulfill all of these stereotypes. If I don’t, I’m acting white. If I do, I’m being black and almost worse because it is synonymous to being ghetto, ignorant, crazy, and what seems like an endless amount of set ideas about who I must be. Figuring out which direction I should go is a constant internal struggle. I feel like the choice between betraying myself and assimilating or being tortured in my own identity isn’t really a choice at all. The similarities I feel that I have with the narrator in terms of experience shows me just how invisible black people have been and continue to be in this country. No matter what I do, I cannot stop the prejudice of my children, or my people. No matter how I act, I cannot make you see me as a human instead of a social construct.
In combination, I have to deal with all three of these aspects of invisibility in my life. As a young black woman, I often feel invisible. But as for my future, I do not know what to do about that. Of course I will not always be young, so this suspended state of adolescence will pass. But as for my identity as a black female, that will most likely never change. Does this mean I should take the same road as the narrator? Live my life accepting the fact that invisibility is inevitable for me? Based on what I’ve read in the prologue the narrator seems confident that there is no “overcoming” his reality. As for me, I will continue to live my life as I have. But I will try to make note of those times when I do feel invisible (not to pretend they do exist as I am so accustomed) and continue to read Invisible Man for what may lead to a possible solution even if only temporary, to being invisible.
Wow, this post gave me a lot of insight to your relation to these books, coming from the same culture and background. I understand about how being a woman is (although changing) is a lot of the times about being grouped into certain archetypes, although I think invisibility is more of a global theme. It is very complete and distinct lifestyle of invisibility in IM, but in our own lives, I think people from every culture have partly (though sometimes a small part) some agency in invisibility and other other part is the circumstances we were dealt with. Also, I was wondering if you see other definitions of invisibility than the the prejudices and cultural groupings.
ReplyDeleteThese are really big and important, but do you connect to the IM's invisibility in the strategies he uses to take advantage of it?
I really like your voice and insight you give on your personal "invisibility". I definitely identify with your point of seeming invisible due to gender. Those surrounding us often seem to project their ideas of what a woman should be upon us. And if we end up acting like they feel we "should", then we maintain our invisibility (but this is usually not a positive invisibility). On the flip side, if we don't adhere to what they think a woman should be, we expose and alienate ourselves? The same can be true for the model that the white power structure has put in place for each race. I'm not sure what solution(s) the book may present. However, I think the fact that we are able to acknowledge and address our invisibility as young women of color is a step in front of the narrator's pre-"enlightened" self who internalized all the oppression he faced.
ReplyDeleteI love your comparison to being invisible with being young. What I would like to hear more of is, what responsibilities does the narrator have to society? I feel the weight of the world with the responsibilities put on me especially as a Uni student. Would you compare this theft of power to teenage rebellion? Is there a hope for equality of races and is there a hope that adults will look at us one day and tell us we are grown? I honestly do not know if I am ready to be grown up yet. America needs to be ready for equality of gender and of the races.
ReplyDeleteI really like your comparison of race as we see it with how it relates to invisibility. I think that each races faces invisibility in a different way and degree. Even as a white female, I feel like I have to fit into the stereotypes of a "white girl." I totally relate to the way you discuss adolescence and being a female. Could we see similar trends in other groups, such as different religions or classes? It would be interesting to explore that idea of invisibility in different contexts.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDo you think the paradox between the narrator being illuminated from every angle, yet somehow being 'invisible', as he describes in the prologue, is at all related to the scene in chapter ten where the doctor's light/"third eye" illuminates our narrator, ostensibly so the doctor can see our narrator better, and yet this blinds our narrator? Light meant to expose everything yet failing to do so, based on who's perspective you look from?
ReplyDeleteI don't know myself, but I keep thinking about what this paradox may or may not mean